I would like to suggest the simple idea, that
over-population can only exist within
cities, and
cannot exist outside of a city.
Let us examine the facts.
1. Outside of cities, there are
fewer people.
2. Cities are constructed in such a way, so that they can handle more people than can be
sustained from the
land.
3. Cities must be
hierarchical, for the control of their
limited resources. An unorganized city would not be a city, at all.
4. In the wild, the survival of people depends on their personal or community's
ability to
sustain itself.
Take a look at the
map. Compare
urban areas to
rural areas, and then to
non-settled areas. It is painfully obvious that over-population exists strictly and only inside cities.
 |
| Depicting Manhattan before urbanization. |
Other than
personal conflicts between peoples,
without the utilization of cities, there would be no instigator to the many
hazards we face today; the results of massive human populations in a small area.
The notion that people
cannot survive in the wild is as
ridiculous as the idea that people
can prosper in the city.
People are being forced and
herded into the cities for the benefit of a few
owners.
Nature does not support this kind of organization. That is why it starts crumbling from the moment it is made, and it crumbles ever more forcefully as time goes on.
It will not last.
We can have all the benefits of the modern world without enforcing on ourselves any city.
Science,
technology,
medicine and
education do not need the city. They only need their own
homes, just as we make shelters and shrines.
 |
| Japan before & after. Thanks to National Geographic for sharing this amazing photo. |